Autonomy without capacity: the role of health facility governing committees in planning and budgeting in Tanzania

Since the inception of health-sector reforms in Tanzania in the 1990s, health planning and implementation was decentralised to the Council Health Management Teams (CHMTs) headed by the District Medical Officer (DMO). This arrangement centralised the autonomy for planning, budgeting and resource allocation at the district level with very limited autonomy and authority at the health facility and community level. Since 2017/2018, the government of Tanzania has further transferred the autonomy to plan, budget and manage financial resources to health facilities. Under the current arrangements, each health facility prepares its comprehensive annual health plan and budget, and funds for the implementation of the plans are transferred directly from the Ministry of Finance and Planning (MoFP) to health facilities; the policy known as Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF). Each health facility is supposed to have a planning team responsible for preparing annual plans. The team is required to: (i) conduct a thorough assessment of the implementation of the previous year comprehensive health facility plans to guide preparation of subsequent annual plan; (ii) gather community opinions regarding priorities and challenges in accessing health care services to inform the planning process; (iii) conduct a robust situational analysis about the morbidity and mortality trends, underlying causes and health system bottlenecks hampering the delivery and uptake of interventions; (iv) prepare plans in accordance to existing guidelines; (v) provide feedback of the approved facility plan to Health Facility Governing Committee (HFGC), Village Development Committee (VDC) and Ward Development Committee (WDC); and (vi) ensure that the plans are responsive to local needs (facility and population). The central government issues guidelines that steer the planning process at the district and health facility levels. The CHMTs and health facilities need to abide by these guidelines when preparing their annual health plans. Similarly, the central government supplies the budget making guidelines, which stipulate the ‘budget ceilings’ that every district and health facility has to adhere to. All facility plans are at later stage consolidated into a Comprehensive Council Health Plan (CCHP) for the whole district. Similarly, the preparation of the CCHP is led by a guideline from the central government. The consolidation process is done by the CCHP planning team led by the District Medical Officers (DMOs). After endorsement at the Council level, the plan is submitted to the Regional Secretariat (RS) for assessment, approval and submission to the national level. At this level, the plan is assessed by assessors comprising members from the President’s Office-Regional Administration and Local Government (PORALG) – Health and MoH and recommended for funding.

Keywords

Decentralisation, Autonomy in planning, Autonomy in budgeting, Tanzania

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/6027

Collections

Institute of Development Studies

Full item page