Implementing Accountability for Reasonableness Framework at District Level in Tanzania: A Realist Evaluation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMaluka, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorKamuzora, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSansebastián, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorByskov, Jens
dc.contributor.authorNdawi, Benedict
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Øystein E.
dc.contributor.authorHurtig, Anna-Karin
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-20T10:19:48Z
dc.date.available2016-06-20T10:19:48Z
dc.date.issued2011-02
dc.description.abstractDespite the growing importance of the Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R) framework in priority setting worldwide, there is still an inadequate understanding of the processes and mechanisms underlying its influence on legitimacy and fairness, as conceived and reflected in service management processes and outcomes. As a result, the ability to draw scientifically sound lessons for the application of the framework to services and interventions is limited. This paper evaluates the experiences of implementing the A4R approach in Mbarali District, Tanzania, in order to find out how the innovation was shaped, enabled, and constrained by the interaction between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. This study draws on the principles of realist evaluation -- a largely qualitative approach, chiefly concerned with testing and refining programme theories by exploring the complex interactions of contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes. Mixed methods were used in data collection, including individual interviews, non-participant observation, and document reviews. A thematic framework approach was adopted for the data analysis. The study found that while the A4R approach to priority setting was helpful in strengthening transparency, accountability, stakeholder engagement, and fairness, the efforts at integrating it into the current district health system were challenging. Participatory structures under the decentralisation framework, central government's call for partnership in district-level planning and priority setting, perceived needs of stakeholders, as well as active engagement between researchers and decision makers all facilitated the adoption and implementation of the innovation. In contrast, however, limited local autonomy, low level of public awareness, unreliable and untimely funding, inadequate accountability mechanisms, and limited local resources were the major contextual factors that hampered the full implementation. This study documents an important first step in the effort to introduce the ethical framework A4R into district planning processes. This study supports the idea that a greater involvement and accountability among local actors through the A4R process may increase the legitimacy and fairness of priority-setting decisions. Support from researchers in providing a broader and more detailed analysis of health system elements, and the socio-cultural context, could lead to better prediction of the effects of the innovation and pinpoint stakeholders' concerns, thereby illuminating areas that require special attention to promote sustainability.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMaluka, S., Kamuzora, P., SanSebastián, M., Byskov, J., Ndawi, B., Olsen, Ø.E. and Hurtig, A.K., 2011. Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation. Implementation Science, 6(1), p.1.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1748-5908-6-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/2625
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAccountability for reasonablenessen_US
dc.titleImplementing Accountability for Reasonableness Framework at District Level in Tanzania: A Realist Evaluationen_US
dc.typeJournal Article, Peer Revieweden_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Implementing Accountability for Reasonableness Framework at District Level In Tanzania A Realist Evaluation.pdf
Size:
8.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full text
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Institute of Development Studies