Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology by Subject "Anaerobic co-digestion"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Anaerobic Batch Co-Digestion of Sisal Pulp and Fish Wastes(Elsevier, 2004) Mshandete, Anthony M.; k, Amelia K.; Rubindamayugi, Mugassa S. T.; Mattiasson, BoCo-digestion of various wastes has been shown to improve the digestibility of the materials and biogas yield. Batchwise digestion of sisal pulp and fish waste was studied both with the wastes separately and with mixtures in various proportions. While the highest methane yields from sisal pulp and fish waste alone were 0.32 and 0.39 m3 CH4/kg volatile solids (VS), respectively, at total solid (TS) of 5%, co-digestion with 33% of fish waste and 67% of sisal pulp representing 16.6% of TS gave a methane yield of 0.62 m3 CH4/kg VS added. This is an increase of 59–94% in the methane yield as compared to that obtained from the digestion of pure fractions at 5% TS.Item Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Biological Pre-Treated Nile Perch Fish Solid Waste with Vegetable Fraction of Market Solid Waste(Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN), 2012) Kassuwi, Shaaban A. A.; Mshandete, Anthony M.; Kivaisi, Amelia K.Anaerobic co-digestion of various organic wastes has been shown to improve biogas yield of fish wastes. This paper presents the effect of pre-treating Nile perch fish solid waste (FSW) using CBR-11 bacterial culture (CBR-11-FSW) and commercial lipase enzyme (Lipo-FSW), followed by batch anaerobic co-digestion with vegetable fractions of market solid waste (VFMSW) in various proportions, using potato waste (PW) and cabbage waste (CW) as co-substrates either singly or combined. Results indicated that CBR-11 pre-treated FSW co-digested with PW or CW in 1:1 ratio (substrate: inoculum) had positive effect on methane yield, while Lipo pre-treated FSW had negative effect on methane yield. Using CBR-11-FSW:PW the highest yield was 1.58 times more than the untreated FSW. Whereas, using Lipo-FSW:CW the highest yield was 1.65 times lower than un-treated FSW. Furthermore, the optimal mixture of CBR-11 pre-treated FSW and PW and CW co-substrates resulted into higher methane yield of 1, 322 CH4 ml/gVS using CBR-11-FSW (10):PW (45):CW (45) ratio. The ratio enhanced methane yield to 135% compared to control. In conclusion, results demonstrates that optimal mixture of CBR-11 pre-treated FSW with both PW and CW as co-substrates enhanced methane yield and provide base line data for potential application in continuous anaerobic bioreactors investigation.