Browsing by Author "Makirita W, Makirita W Chauka L and Chacha M"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Antimicrobial and cytotoxicity Activity of Clausena anisata, Acokanthera shemperii and Olea europaea growing in Tanzania(European Journal of Medicinal Plants, 2016-04) Makirita W, Makirita W Chauka L and Chacha MAims: To evaluate antimicrobial and cytotoxicity activities of Clausena anisata, Acokanthera shemperii and Olea europaea against seven Gram negative bacteria and fungal species. Study Design: Bioassay of antimicrobial assay was done using 96-well micro-dilution method. Place and Duration of Study: School of Life Science and Bioengineering, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania, from April 2014 to June 2014. Methodology: 96-well micro dilution method was used in antimicrobial assay. Extracts were loaded in the wells of the first row, followed by serial dilution and 50 μl of the bacterial suspensions (0.5 MacFarland standard turbidity) were added in each well. The first concentration which showed no bacterial growth was considered as minimum inhibition concentration. Method developed by Meyer et al 1982 was adopted in cytotoxicity activities. Results: All extracts indicated antibacterial activity on at least three to five of the tested seven bacteria and two fungi species with MIC value ranging 0.7812 - 12.5 mg/mL. The highest activityItem Larvicidal activity of Clausena anisata fruits and leaves extracts against Anopheles gambiae Giles s.s, Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes egyptiae(Spatula DD, 2015-11) Makirita W, Makirita W Chauka L and Chacha MAim: The study aimed to evaluate larvicidal efficacy of Clausena anisata fruits and a leaf extracts against the 3rd instar Anopheles gambiae Giles s.s,Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes egyptiae larvae. Methods: The protocol developed by the World Health Organisation was adopted with minor modifications. Results: The larvicidal activity study of Clausena anisata has revealed the selectivity of plant parts against the mosquito larvae. The leaf extracts displayed high potency against the 3rd instar Anopheles gambiae in which ethyl acetate leaf extract demonstrated high activity at LC50 of 0.0977 μg/mL followed by methanolic (LC50 0.9362 μg/mL) and chloroform (LC50 4.2384 μg/mL) extracts. The fruit ethyl acetate selectively exhibited the highest activity against A. egyptiae with LC50 of 5.3346 μg/mL. Culex quinquefasciatus larvae exhibited more resistance compared to A. gambiae and A. egyptiae larvae in which LC50 range of 78.658 – 178.895 μg/mL after 72 hours was displayed. Conclusion: The leaves and fruits of C. anisata are potential source of botanical mosquito repellants and thus employed for the management of mosquito borne diseases. Leaves extracts selectively exhibited activity against A. gambiae indicating its potential use in the control of malaria. Fruits ethyl acetate extract had better activity against A. egyptiae larvae suggesting its use in the management of dengue fever, chikungunya and yellow fever viruses. It is apparently evident that C. anisata leaf extracts possess high potency against A. gambiae larvae compared to Bacillus Thuringiensis, subsp. Israeliensis (BTI®) which is the larvicidal product with high specificity against mosquito larva.